Re: Boycott the Da vinci Code
- From: "grantco" <grantco13@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 May 2006 07:00:44 -0700
Pastor Dave wrote:
On 17 Apr 2006 10:01:34 -0700, "ryan"
<ryanlas@xxxxxxxxx> spake thusly:
There is evidence that Mary Magdaline played a larger role in the story
There is zero evidence.
Gospel of Mary, Gospel of Philip and the numerous quotes of her
importance in the bible itself. What purpose would there be for such
quotes to exist?
Besides, what difference does it make to you Pastor Dave if Mary's role
is larger or not?
It doesn't necessarily have to imply that they were married and had
children, does it?
Her scripture was conveniently left out of the bible because
at the time
Wrong. That text was written much later.
"Much later?" What 80 to 100 years? Before the collection of the New
Testement existed anyway?
You are falsely taking the time of the decision
of which books would be included and then
leaving out the part of when each text was
written, which was later and not by anyone
who lived at the time of the events.
They've pretty much proven that NONE of the Gospels were actually
written by the people whose names appear at the top. Again about the
only person who one can be fairly certain wrote (most of) the books
ascribed to him is the Apostle Paul who once again is the one person of
all the disciples/apostles who never knew Jesus while he was ALIVE.
conveniently leave that out, because it
doesn't suit YOUR purpose and then, you
have the nerve to claim that OTHERS had
bad motives. (:
You conveniently leave out why it matters whether Mary had a larger
role in the story of Jesus or not. Her "larger role" doesn't
necessarily imply they were married and had children.
Or do you merely have a fear of sinful female body parts? :-)
- Prev by Date: Re: Boycott the Da vinci Code
- Next by Date: Re: Boycott the Da vinci Code
- Previous by thread: Re: Boycott the Da vinci Code
- Next by thread: 666, the number of the beast