Gay marriage ban isn't fair



Gay marriage ban isn't fair

An interesting view from a "fundamentalist Christian". Please read the
whole article.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/editorials/dec05/381007.asp

Gay marriage ban isn't fair
By DEAN MUNDY
Posted: Dec. 28, 2005

There are two bills just passed by the Wisconsin Senate that will most
likely be up for referendum in the near future. I must admit, I'm torn
between the two sides on each bill.

The first is the amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution defining marriage
as being between a man and a woman. It looks like a sure thing to pass the
Assembly and be on the ballot in November. The second is a bill to ask the
public if Wisconsin should reinstitute the death penalty. I will tackle
that in a later column.

First of all, I'm a conservative. I'm a Christian, yes, even one of those
"fundamentalists" who believe one should do what the Bible teaches and who
many suspect are trying to take our country down the road to theocracy.
Whatever.

I admit that the Bible, for me, clearly teaches that marriage is between a
man and a woman only. You don't have to read far to see that. In several
places.

The most widely quoted by opponents to a biblical view is the verse in
Leviticus about stoning homosexuals. Unfortunately opponents usually
ignore Paul's teaching in Romans 1, what God told Adam and Eve early in
Genesis, and, most importantly, Jesus' repetition of that definition in
Matthew 19.

Now why this makes me a "homophobe" or a person who hates homosexuals, I
have no idea. I believe smoking is wrong, but I don't hate smokers. I
believe getting drunk is wrong, but I don't hate drunkards. I believe
divorce and adultery are wrong, but I don't hate divorced people or those
who commit adultery. I believe, well, you get my drift, I hope.

Many on the left see this amendment as a political ploy, and for many who
voted for it, that would be true. But I think there are others, many
others, just like me who believe homosexuality to be wrong. They feel we
need to do something about it.

But I'm not in favor of this amendment. For me, it's a matter of fairness
and justice. Homosexuals should have the same opportunities that
heterosexuals do. It's as simple as that.

I believe that under our form of government, people should have equal
protection under the law. This would include homosexuals.

My fellow conservatives and friends in the religious right are, no doubt,
readying e-mails and letters to straighten me out. Hey, I know what they
are going to say. The arguments are familiar. I've heard them and made
them myself before.

They will write me about how this will lead us down a slippery slope to a
time when polygamy, etc., will be made legal also.

They believe that we must defeat this is to defend marriage. If so, it's a
last-ditch defense.

Look, marriage and families have been under stress for years and not just
from homosexuals and liberals. Poverty, single parenthood, materialism,
the feminist movement, divorce, people living together and other things
add to the stress. We on the right are wrong to just blame the homosexual
"agenda."


Other conservatives might insist that homosexuals receive equal treatment
now. They can marry anyone they want as long as it's someone of the
opposite sex.

Isn't this a little bit like Henry Ford when he said one could have any
color Model T they wanted as long as it was black?

I'm conflicted, I admit, because like everyone else, I tend to vote my
values. Those on both sides of the issue say the values are clear. I'm not
so sure.

As one seeking to minister Christianity, I have to go back to how Jesus
lived his life on Earth. Contrary to the opinion of most, it's not that
Jesus never got angry (look at how he cleansed the temple and condemned
religious leaders, for example).

But he did respond to the down and out with compassion. The adulterous
woman was saved from her rightful doom. Lepers, prostitutes, tax
collectors, drunks - he sought them all out to do good to them. I cannot
do less to those who are homosexual.

As I've mentioned, other people whom I believe are living wrongly are free
to do so legally. Why shouldn't homosexuals have that opportunity?

It's only fair, really.

Dean Mundy of Waukesha is a self-employed missionary. His e-mail address
is thoughtfulconservative@xxxxxxxxx
--
*Peace of Christ*
http://grace.break.at
To send e-mail, remove "youhat" from address
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gay marriage ban isnt fair
    ... > Gay marriage ban isn't fair ... > An interesting view from a "fundamentalist Christian". ... > "fundamentalists" who believe one should do what the Bible teaches and who ... > Now why this makes me a "homophobe" or a person who hates homosexuals, ...
    (alt.religion.christian)
  • Gay Marriage to the Christian church.
    ... Christian brothers have rightly taken a hard line on the issue. ... Aren’t age of consent laws just another moral ... The arguments put forward by the gay lobby is that Homosexuals deserve ... land and these relative morals to overtake the world. ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
  • [R_Catholic-L] THE CHRISTIAN VIEW OF SEX
    ... THE CHRISTIAN VIEW OF SEX: A TIME FOR APOLOGETICS, ... activity outside of marriage ù with all of its attendant problems ù has double ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: [OT] The record industry, RIAA and US law
    ... Given the current status of gay marriage in the U.S., ... President, playing to the typically bigoted and intolerant Christian ... I don't believe Leviticus is the law of the land, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • "I declared war on those at Wellesley Meeting" -David Christainsen
    ... "The sort of behaviour which gets one thrown out of Wellesley Meeting" ... "I broke the rules this morning at Worship at Wellesley Meeting. ... Christ's Teaching on Marriage was "disruptive". ... their Christian identity is weak and their standards lax. ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)

Loading