Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke <duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:23:04 -0500
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:46:17 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
In article <v348a7pie6c4fn6huk9enrs4j04n6vs7ij@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:38:46 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:Measures.) wrote:
In article <6pe5a7t5kjqrh7rog7fr28c71ise0fb1bc@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:36:15 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
In article <9t43a715c48rtuoigr4qgmimsbejp1dd1e@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:53:45 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
In article <i2j0a7dqo5oebi2j7ij3nf738hq395g6ll@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:33:33 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
? $660,000,000 in hush money is a pretty damn good clue.Measures.) wrote:
In article <46cu975gvjns55n7fp1ivfjfergaqrb53f@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:08:37 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
? still defemding sodomist priests. Think you that the BVM does notMeasures.) wrote:
In article <1rto97hbu1er9aqofdsjsecak02ic2413u@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:33:26 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
? If I had had a good telescope I might have been able to sell admissionsMeasures.) wrote:
In article <tkll97t1o80n68meqqsfsn6klmbijj36mu@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:26:44 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
Measures.) wrote:
In article <ol8g97p1ql8e03voqpur9f21m8oqh3ai1g@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:46:41 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
buttrammers.
? The trials would have been a PR disaster.
But not $3 billion without trials?
? $3,000,000,000 was the bargained price of not trying the
? hope springs eternal.trials. No
A whole lot of scam artists would have gone empty hanged with the
? I haven't been around a priest in over a dozen years.? > 50%?witnesses, you know.? So the RCC was scammed ?
In some cases.
No idea. You're closer to them than I am.
Most of the action was well before then.
All the action was when you were around them.
? you seem to have forgotten that I live across Calleguas Creek from
quite likely The hottest love nest in the altar-boy scandle -- I.E. Saint
John's Semenary [sic]. .
I didn't forget.
to those who were willing to pay to see priestly emissions.
Yep, some people will do anything for money.
notice this?
I'm not defending them. I'm waiting on confirmation of guilt
I've already told you it was about love for the hurt even without a trial.
The dukester, American-American
*****
Romans 1:16-17
It is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes:
for Jew first, then Greek. For in it is revealed the righteousness
of God from faith to faith; as it is written, "The one who is
righteous by faith will live."
*****
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- References:
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- Prev by Date: Re: Coming to all Catholic countries soon
- Next by Date: Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- Previous by thread: Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- Next by thread: Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|