Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?

In article <v348a7pie6c4fn6huk9enrs4j04n6vs7ij@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:38:46 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:

In article <6pe5a7t5kjqrh7rog7fr28c71ise0fb1bc@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:36:15 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:

In article <9t43a715c48rtuoigr4qgmimsbejp1dd1e@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:53:45 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:

In article <i2j0a7dqo5oebi2j7ij3nf738hq395g6ll@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:33:33 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
Measures.) wrote:

In article <46cu975gvjns55n7fp1ivfjfergaqrb53f@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:08:37 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
Measures.) wrote:

In article <1rto97hbu1er9aqofdsjsecak02ic2413u@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:33:26 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
Measures.) wrote:

In article <tkll97t1o80n68meqqsfsn6klmbijj36mu@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:26:44 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
Measures.) wrote:

In article <ol8g97p1ql8e03voqpur9f21m8oqh3ai1g@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:46:41 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L.
Measures.) wrote:


? The trials would have been a PR disaster.

But not $3 billion without trials?

? $3,000,000,000 was the bargained price of not trying the
buttrammers.

A whole lot of scam artists would have gone empty hanged with the
trials. No
witnesses, you know.

? So the RCC was scammed ?

In some cases.

? > 50%?

No idea. You're closer to them than I am.

? I haven't been around a priest in over a dozen years.

Most of the action was well before then.

? hope springs eternal.

All the action was when you were around them.

? you seem to have forgotten that I live across Calleguas Creek from
quite likely The hottest love nest in the altar-boy scandle -- I.E. Saint
John's Semenary [sic]. .

I didn't forget.

? If I had had a good telescope I might have been able to sell admissions
to those who were willing to pay to see priestly emissions.

Yep, some people will do anything for money.

? still defemding sodomist priests. Think you that the BVM does not
notice this?

I'm not defending them. I'm waiting on confirmation of guilt

? $660,000,000 in hush money is a pretty damn good clue.

--
Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
    ... In article, duke ... I haven't been around a priest in over a dozen years. ... quite likely The hottest love nest in the altar-boy scandle -- ... $660,000,000 in hush money is a pretty damn good clue. ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
    ... In article, duke ... I haven't been around a priest in over a dozen years. ... quite likely The hottest love nest in the altar-boy scandle -- I.E. Saint ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
    ... In article, duke ... quite likely The hottest love nest in the altar-boy scandle -- ... still defemding sodomist priests. ... $660,000,000 in hush money is a pretty damn good clue. ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: Mary
    ... In article, duke ... The door for us to Jesus definitely went thru Mary. ... miscreant Roman Catholic priest with an 11-yr Church record ... Gauthe had been moved several times after confessing to sodding boys ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)
  • Re: Mary
    ... In article, duke ... used my womb so that Jesus could be born and save everyone, ... The door for us to Jesus definitely went thru Mary. ... miscreant Roman Catholic priest with an 11-yr Church record ...
    (alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic)