Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke <duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:19:33 -0500
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:08:37 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
In article <1rto97hbu1er9aqofdsjsecak02ic2413u@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:33:26 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:trials. No
In article <tkll97t1o80n68meqqsfsn6klmbijj36mu@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:26:44 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
In article <ol8g97p1ql8e03voqpur9f21m8oqh3ai1g@xxxxxxx>, duke
<duckgumbo32@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:46:41 -0700, rL@xxxxxxxxx (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
? The trials would have been a PR disaster.
But not $3 billion without trials?
? $3,000,000,000 was the bargained price of not trying the buttrammers.
A whole lot of scam artists would have gone empty hanged with the
? I haven't been around a priest in over a dozen years.? > 50%?witnesses, you know.? So the RCC was scammed ?
In some cases.
No idea. You're closer to them than I am.
Most of the action was well before then.
The dukester, American-American
*****
Romans 1:16-17
It is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes:
for Jew first, then Greek. For in it is revealed the righteousness
of God from faith to faith; as it is written, "The one who is
righteous by faith will live."
*****
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- References:
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: Patrick
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: duke
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- From: • R. L. Measures.
- Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- Prev by Date: Re: Just a comment about Islam
- Next by Date: Pastoral letter #226
- Previous by thread: Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- Next by thread: Re: IS THE PAPACY VALID?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|