Re: Duke's integrity
- From: CE <jlrisdon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:01:23 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 22, 12:58 am, CE <jlris...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 21, 1:46 pm, duke <duckgumb...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:50:08 -0800 (PST), CE <jlris...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are currently three thread on this newsgroup about Duke's
integrity.
Now, I'm sure Duke is a very important person to all of you. But may I
ask why his own integrity is such a concern to all of you?
They can't argue their points, so they scream "liar".
Even if, for the sake of argument, he had no integrity, individual
comments he makes might still be valid in and of themselves. If, on
the other hand, he's got tons of integrity but is wrong, it's still up
to the person discussing with him to point out why his comments are
wrong.
None have that ability. I would welcome discussion, but alas, they are blank
pages.
I can certainly see why you might want to decide to continue to
discuss with him if you respect him or choose to stop discussing
topics if you don't respect him. I have a great deal more difficulty
why his integrity itself should be such a hot topic of discussion.
I mean, who cares?
They're trying to save face.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
They certainly seem less interested in examining why your integrity
matters so much to them as they are in simply attacking you personally.
Of course, if they're just trolls, then the last thing they'd want is
to discuss their own motivations.
.
- References:
- Duke's integrity
- From: CE
- Re: Duke's integrity
- From: duke
- Re: Duke's integrity
- From: CE
- Duke's integrity
- Prev by Date: Re: Duke's integrity
- Next by Date: Jésus CHRIST - Le code Antoll MA
- Previous by thread: Re: Duke's integrity
- Next by thread: November 21st - Feast of the Presentation of Mary
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
