Re: Is God Catholic?


"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hiojq1lh84h772o55arc3e30258a2ddnav@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:47:35 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
> Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
> opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
> <mcca5761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>>"Bonnie Bitch" <bonnieb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>>>>
>>>>>>> No one in their right minds would support your cult of child rapists
>>>>>>> and its sick deathstyle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cult of child rapists?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup.
>>>>
>>>>Nope
>>>
>>> Gosh, the current fuss in your cult about priests buggering minors
>>> must really bother you so much to cause such denial of reality,
>>> Mary-bamela.
>>
>>It bothers me immensely - of course it makes you jump with glee.
>
> Only if you were the one being raped, bam, even though you'd enjoy it
> too much.
>
>>>>and child abuse could
>>>>be anything from punishing a kid severely to, well, things queers do to
>>>>kids.
>>>
>>> Please try to stay on topic by learning to read what was written.
>>
>>It was you who jumped from buggering to generic child abuse.
>
> No, that was your strawman, christstain.
> Of course, you knew that, so you snipped it out.
>
>>>> "Heterosexual" is another word hijacked
>>>>by the *** bandits.
>>>
>>> The vast majority of *** bandits are HETEROsexual, so you and your
>>> ilk have hijacked your own word. LOL.
>>
>>That's like saying most black people are white.
>
> Not at all.
> The vast majority of "*** bandits" (i.e., people who engage in anal
> sex) are HETEROsexual.
> You couldn't have meant anything else, as such a nasty aspersion would
> put you out of communion with your cult.
>
>>>> "Heterosexual" was first listed in Merriam-Websters's
>>>>New International Dictionary as a medical term for "morbid sexual
>>>>passion
>>>>for one of the opposite sex" .
>>>
>>> Oh, bamela, how cute of you to leave out the rest of the Wikipedia
>>> entry for that word.
>>>
>>> "The term "heterosexual" was coined shortly after and opposite to the
>>> word "homosexual" by Karl Maria Kertbeny in 1868 and was first
>>> published in 1869."
>>
>>Correct - and it wasn't redefined until 1934.
>
> So? Language evolves.
> Ibu naw, we secgen todæg þone calf inne stedem beef, mynheer hlutorer.
> LOL!
> BTW, the above is English. With your bent for a static quality in
> language, you should have absolutely no problem understanding the
> above, as it is English. LOL!
> Pretty cool, eh? Maybe you'd be less gidgy your boo was at the crib to
> help with your freak.
> The preceding was also English. LOL.
> Language evolves. Get over your allegedly heterosexual self. LOL
>
>>> Also, you left out the bit about what Webster's Second Edition
>>> Unabridged gave as a definition.
>>> "manifestation of sexual passion for one of the opposite sex"
>>
>>Correct - and it wasn't redefined until 1934
>
> So? Language evolves.
> Ibu naw, we secgen todæg þone calf inne stedem beef, mynheer hlutorer.
> LOL!
>>>
>>> Why is it that you christstains can't tell the truth ever?
>>
>>You have to stop asking questions with planted accusations, Bonnie.
>
> Pot-kettle-bamela.
>
>>But
>>you're not looking for answers anyway are you?
>
> Pot-kettle-bamela.
>
>>>>To give it any other meaning is like inventing a word for people who
>>>>walk
>>>>forward rather than backward.
>>>
>>> Thank you for refuting yourself.
>>>
>>>>Hetero also refers to something abnormal. (like heterodox as opposed to
>>>>orthodox). But you haven't called me a heterosexist yet. It's much more
>>>>chic.
>>>
>>> Another lie from a monolingual christstain.
>>> The prefix hereto- means different or other.
>>
>>Different from the norm.
>
> No, you lied again. You also removed the cites I generously provided
> which prove you wrong. Coward. LOL
>
>>It's ridiculous to call sexual attraction between a
>>male and female as different -
>
> Only you are doing that.
>
> Hetero -- different or other
> sexual -- having to do with gender
>
> Heterosexual = having to do with the other gender.
>
> It's not that hard, dip***.
> Oh, oops -- I bet that made for a nasty flashback for you of your last
> rent-a-date. LOL
>
>> it's normal.
>
> All four sexual orientations:
>
> occur naturally
>
> conform to a type, standard, or regular pattern
>
> are inherently free from mental disorder (unlike your religious
> zealotry)
>
> constitute and do not deviate from a norm, rule, or principle
>
> I suppose that you are stupid enough to make a case for sexual
> orientation being perpendicular to a tangent at a point of tangency or
> having a concentration of one gram equivalent of solute per liter.
>
> And if you're really pissed about not getting any paid Xmas gigs
> because no one in their right mind would willingly hire you, you could
> even say that sexual orientation doesn't have the property of
> commutativity under multiplication by the transpose of the matrix each
> of whose elements is a conjugate complex number with respect to the
> corresponding element of the given matrix.
>
> LOL!
> Damn, that was funny. I just love it when you theophiles *** up so
> bad that you get pounded on. LOL
>
>>Being queer is heterodox
>
> Homosexuality is not a religion and therefore has nothing to go
> against.
> No sexual orientation goes against an acknowledged standard.
> And the only one holding unorthodox opinions or doctrines is you.
>
>>because
>>you go after the wrong sex.
>
> Not at all. I "go after" the right sex -- men. It's normal, natural,
> and gratifying. At times. For me.
> For you -- who cares? Please die a virgin. And soon. You're using up
> the air for the thinking humans. TIA
>
> Happy FOAD --
>
> Bonnie Bitch

Why argue with an incorrigible flamer?

And dflgvn i8osdfjsdlkf! Because I dslkf vikdfoimhgnfm sji8 kdfvpidjmg
jerkjllsjf!!

BAM


.