Re: bible says all catholics and religious people are all KOOKS

On 14 Oct 2005 00:45:33 -0700, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of
"AveMawhorraRA" <seank@xxxxxxx>

>Resorting to one ad homonym after another is hardly just "venting".

Your use of "homynym" bears no referential value and is therefore
meaningless.

>I will tell you why I don't think I am better than you or anyone else
>for that matter.

But sweetie, you just offered to "pray" for me, when we all know
prayer is about the one doing the praying. That's about as
condescending as you can get, although I'm sure you're just full of
surprises on that front.

<snip meaningless quote which is incongruous with Mawhorra's behavior>

<snip disingenuous protests of innocence and humility>

> If you want to believe that Christianity is some George Orwell
>conspiracy go ahead,

Nah. Orwell had nothing that could even compare to you and your cult.

<snip blather about Paul/Saul, who was a misogynistic, self-loathing
pig>

>Strictly speaking though
>Christ is calling us

No, because this alleged Christ person never existed.

<snip delusions>

> God is incapable of deceiving.

Imaginary beings, in and of themselves, are incapable of anything.
It's the believers in the imaginary beings that need the watching
over. And heavy doses of anti-psychotic meds.
Now go feed the invisible purple monkey on your monitor. His name is
Simon. Simon is real. You're just not looking for the right proof, and
that's your first obstacle to believing in Simon. I have a book that
says Simon is real. Really for real. Simon is real.

>This "freedom" which Christianity is not so

Slavery is freedom. Black is white. We are at war with Oceania. We
have always been at war with Oceania. We have never been at war with
Pacifica. Pacifica is our friend. Just ask Pilkington. Napoleon will
confirm that, since he's more equal than some animals.
Soma, baby! Soma!


<snip more delusions>

Hey, you know the old saying -- Love the delusional, hate the
delusion. Or something like that.

> It seems to me, given what is at risk here you might want to make sure
>there isn't something more to it.

And the big risk is <drum roll> another unprovable, non-existent
concept -- a soul.

Now a quote from another religion's grimoire, for your perusal and
contemplation:

I am light
I am one too strong to fight
Return to dark where shadows dwell
You can not have this rebel
Fear ye not, O Mindless Drone,
For ET shall soon home phone.

> If you are right and I am wrong than
>poof we are gone, it didn't matter. But, God forbid, if I am right and
>you are wrong then we have eternity to think about it. I think that was
>the whole point of Pascal's Wager.

Pacsal lost the bet, FYI.

>Sure I could do all those things for you, but this conversation could
>possibly benefit you the most.

Go feed your invisible purple monkey. He's sitting on your monitor,
and he's very hungry. Now, you could say that he's not really there,
but the consequences of my being right... well, let's just invoke
Pascal's wager and call it a day, shall we?
Oh, the monkey's name is Simon, and he prefers brand-name bananas, not
generic. TYVM, on Simon's behalf.

Now, about this post-gouging, you cowardly bitch.....
.