Re: Pure Tempus-1S

Scott wrote:

I see the Evoke-1S seems to be compatible with DAB+ but the Tempus is
not. I am not holding my breath for a quick introduction of DAB+ but
does this mean he Evoke has a more up to date chipset and does this
offer other advantages?

Any thoughts welcome.

Only one small thought, and you did say any thoughts.
Apparently the DAB+ chipset is a lot more power efficient than the older chipset.

Richard E.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Pure Tempus-1S
    ... 'Specs' for each and both say 0.9 Watts stand-by and 2.48 Watts in ... I wonder if DAB+ compatibility has just been omitted from the ... More likely they both use the new chipset, but the Tempus doesn't have ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Pure Tempus-1S
    ... 'Specs' for each and both say 0.9 Watts stand-by and 2.48 Watts in ... I wonder if DAB+ compatibility has just been omitted from the ... More likely they both use the new chipset, but the Tempus doesn't have the software for DAB+. ... It's still worth their while however using the new chipset, they just don't program it for DAB+. ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Frontier upgrades DAB receiver chip
    ... "The chip has gone into volume production, and Frontier Silicon says ... DAB radios and digital audio products using the Chorus 2 will start ... Frontier-Silicon won't want to have their chipset in DAB+ ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Pure Tempus-1S
    ... Apparently the DAB+ chipset is a lot more power efficient than the older ... 'Specs' for each and both say 0.9 Watts stand-by and 2.48 Watts in ... yet the Evoke supports DAB+ and the Tempus does ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Synchronisation - please ignore previous post - doh!
    ... >> Evoke in the kitchen and the tv in the living room, ... it's no longer playing with the Evoke. ... DAB is delayed relative to FM because DAB uses "time interleaving", ... There's probably other processing delays that ...
    (alt.radio.digital)