Re: Steve and Jamie - please give it a rest

"seani" <ingliss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6933efcd-dd88-480f-b13a-bb2728250b07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 22, 10:40 am, "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"seani" <ingl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:943670db-0bd3-4539-9e13-e7e2e8cc390a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 22, 9:59 am, "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



<boltar2...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:h9a2gv$jic$1@xxxxxxxxxxx

We all know you 2 can't stand each other but the endless tit for
tat
posts
are getting a little tedious. Whoever may have been right in the
first place
is irrelevant now as you're both making tits of yourselves so
why
not just
agree to disagree and call it a day.

I would give it a rest with Jamie, but it's not as simple as that,
because you've got Sean "I'm obsessed with Steve" Inglis sticking
his
oar in at every juncture with his obsessional lunacy.

You're one of the group of people on here who frequently has a go
at
me, so I think it's time that "your group" had a quiet word with
this
lunatic that stalks me on here (preferably a quiet word that
involves
getting the men with white coats round and carting him off in a
straitjacket), because it's taking the fucking piss.

I care, with no offense to boltar, nothing for his opinion or anyone
else's on this particular instance.

I stick my oar in occasionally. There are plenty of your rants where
I've never commented. It's all here Steve, recorded indefinitely.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It isn't me that's got something to hide, Sean. YOU are the one who
IS
completely obsessed with me.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You keep claiming you'd prefer I didn't post, yet you mention me by
name apropos of nothing in unrelated posts. Stop doing that and
you'll
almost certainly reduce the number of times I need to respond or
comment. But I'll respond as I see fit whenever that happens.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Don't try to claim that me using yoru name is an excuse for the fact
that the frequency of your posts has increased DRAMATICALLY since I
removed you from my killfile.



I'm stating it as a self-evident fact and a matter of record. You
include my name where you don't need to. You unrealistically expect no
response.

Your imaginary killfile has absolutely no influence on my behaviour.
Why should it? Even if it exists you routinely subvert it by checking
through different logins. Again a matter of fact and record.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You've made some very direct accusations about my position on some
very delicate matters. I'm certainly not letting it drop until I'm
good and ready.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Drop what, Sean? WTF are YOU going to drop? Your obsession with me
caused you to ignore the fact that you were sticking up for Jamie,
who
was 15/16 having a sexual relationship with someone aged at least
26,
and I wouldn't be surprised if they "met" on the Internet and likely
had sex before he was legal as well. THAT is what you were sticking
up
for in order to score cheap points against me on fucking Usenet. You
need help. You really need help.



Your characterisation - in fact lies - concerning what I said and
didn't say - they aren't a reflection of reality.

I haven't expressed any opinion on the two issues you continue to
belabor, certainly not the opinions you ascribe to me.

These are your own words and fantasies, not mine.

I stick up for Jamie's right not to have his personal life intruded on
in the way you attempt. Anything other conclusions you draw from that
is a smokescreen and total non-sequitur - an attempt to divert
attention from your own behaviour.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'm trying to work here, so I'll just reply to the point about my
characterisation of what you've done. I have not lied about what you
did, Sean. You DID turn a blind eye to what I was being critical
about. That is not a lie.

You also claimed that my questioniing was solely to extract
informatino about Jamie's sex life, when in fact that's bull***, and
you're yet again claiming that you know what's in my mind better than
I do. You don't.

And with regards to me "intruding" into Jamie's personal life, if he
didn't make the accusations he repeatedly does about me I would just
ignore him, but in every fucking post he claims that I'm thick and
that I haven't got the qualications that i worked fucking hard for,
and that I've somehow got a very poor level of knowledge of digital
radio and so on. I'm sick to fucking death of him, and I don't
apologise for questioning him about what he's said on here.

I went through a phase a few months ago of deliberately trying to be
reasonable with this objectionable little *** to see if he would stop
the abuse, but he ignored all of that and just continued with his
incessant abuse. But you turn a complete blind eye to what he says
about me, because you're not obsessed with him, you're only obsessed
with me.

My questioning of him was honestly intended to see if I could figure
out whether what he's been saying was bull*** or exaggeration or
whatever. Only when that failed to get any new information did I turn
to the issue with Scott.

All of the above is no doubt wasting my breath, because I'm trying to
reason with someone who has an obsessional hatred of me. At least I've
tried.




--
Steve - www.savefm.org - stop the BBC bullies switching off FM

www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - digital radio news & info

"It is the sheer volume of online audio content available via
internet-connected devices which terrifies the UK radio industry. I
believe that broadband-delivered radio will explode in the years to
come, offering very local, unregulated content, as well as opening a
window to the radio stations of the world." - from the Myers Report


.

Loading