Re: Good article on Internet radio
- From: "jamie powell" <jamie_p84@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:13:21 +0100
"2Bdecided" <davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43b7b7e9-4615-4f37-8933-9fc7d0fc2acc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20 July, 22:24, Silk <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
but of course
the UK broadcasters refuse to do that because they're bullies and they
couldn't care less about their listeners.
There you go again. You can't go accusing people of things without any
evidence.
You just said that to trigger the posting of a 4-page pre-written post
full of evidence, didn't you?
Evidence is the one thing your alter ego is very short of. He can easily
produce 4-pages of self-indulgent obsessive drivel though.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Good article on Internet radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Good article on Internet radio
- References:
- Good article on Internet radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Good article on Internet radio
- From: Silk
- Re: Good article on Internet radio
- From: 2Bdecided
- Good article on Internet radio
- Prev by Date: Re: Good article on Internet radio
- Next by Date: Re: Good article on Internet radio
- Previous by thread: Re: Good article on Internet radio
- Next by thread: Re: Good article on Internet radio
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
