Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: hwh <iimeeltje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:17:20 +0200
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
Multicast will also help at some point, and perhaps peer-to-peer
streaming (like Octoshape or Abacast do).
Both of those technologiese are used for live streaming, so they can't be used for on-demand streams, which is what the iPlayer TV streams are.
True, but any technology that saves bandwidth on one side (streaming can consume lots of it) makes other use possible.
Still cache servers will help for on demand streaming. A large provider's cache will hold popular content.
gr, hwh
.
- References:
- New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: neil-mclean
- Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: hwh
- Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: hwh
- Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: hwh
- Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- Prev by Date: Re: New Band 3 test broadcasts on DAB
- Next by Date: Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- Previous by thread: Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- Next by thread: Re: New JazzFM 64k wma.eventually 64k aac+
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|