Re: DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- From: "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@dead>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:39:23 GMT
Boltar wrote:
On Apr 28, 3:22 pm, "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@dead> wrote:
That will mean that DVB-H2 will also be able to use 1.7 MHz channels
as well - exactly the same channel bandwidth as DAB. The main
drawback of using
Presumably they'd use whole channel for audio and not just have a
blank bit where the video would normally be?
DVB-H can carry anything, so DVB-H2 will as well.
Can't help thinking thats a lot of technology to achieve essentially
the same as this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio_receiver
What are you doing on a newsgroup about digital radio then?
--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info
The adoption of DAB was the most incompetent technical
decision ever made in the history of UK broadcasting:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/dab/incompetent_adoption_of_dab.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- From: Boltar
- Re: DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- References:
- DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- From: Boltar
- DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- Prev by Date: Re: OT. FM stereo noise cancellation.
- Next by Date: Re: OT. FM stereo noise cancellation.
- Previous by thread: Re: DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- Next by thread: Re: DAB industry admits DAB is outdated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|