Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: "Malcolm Knight" <firstinitial.secondinitial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:45:53 -0000
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@dead> wrote in message
news:Lvm1j.19201$7k5.5650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Malcolm Knight wrote:
I used to get around 90% of 8Mbs but I only get a little over 50% ofOh, right, I didn't know that.
24Mbs. You'll never get 90% of 24 as it is an exaggeration compared
to 8 MBs, one includes overheads and the other doesn't.
It's what I read on thinkbroadband.org when ADSL2 first appeared and
what I was told by my own ISP support. On reflection, the old 2Mb/s
service included overheads. I'm not sure about 8Mb/s.
I reckon there'll be even more complaints about ADSL2+ then if they
promote it as "up to 24 Mbps", because people are already grumbling
about "up to 8 Mbps" now that the initial buzz of getting a faster
connection has worn off.
Maybe only the technically savvy. I recently discovered a friend on an
up to 8Mbs service who was getting a miserable 150kbs and seemed
perfectly happy with it.
--
Malcolm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- References:
- Review of DRM radio
- From: Boltar
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: Brian Gregory [UK]
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: Giuseppe
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: Malcolm Knight
- Re: Review of DRM radio
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Review of DRM radio
- Prev by Date: Re: Review of DRM radio
- Next by Date: Re: Review of DRM radio
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of DRM radio
- Next by thread: Re: Review of DRM radio
- Index(es):