Re: Honda robot advert
- From: "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@dead>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:01:36 GMT
davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 5 Jun, 20:41, Silk <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
It did have a purpose, which was that it was on observation that
technology does move forwards in seemingly all fields other than
bloody digital radio, which is the only technology I can think of
that has actually moved backwards wrt analogue technology.
Again, you're confusing the technology with its implementation. DAB
can easily outperform FM if implemented correctly.
Please explain how DAB can simultaneously provide greater spectrum
efficiency, higher audio quality, and more robust reception than FM
when delivering independent local stations?
You can ask him to explain how DAB is going to provide national coverage as
well:
http://media.guardian.co.uk/radio/story/0,,2096010,00.html
;-)
--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info
Find the cheapest Freeview & DAB prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/freeview/freeview_receivers.php
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/dab/dab_radios.php
.
- References:
- Honda robot advert
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Honda robot advert
- From: Sean Inglis
- Re: Honda robot advert
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Honda robot advert
- From: Silk
- Re: Honda robot advert
- From: davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Honda robot advert
- Prev by Date: Re: It would have made an excellent DAB system -- without all the phycoacoustical complexity: NICAM in UHF band...
- Next by Date: DAB too pricey to go nationwide
- Previous by thread: Re: Honda robot advert
- Next by thread: Any HD Radio/MP3 players? Recording?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|