Re: DRM at 23 kbps
- From: DRM-Fan <amstereofan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 May 2007 06:11:13 -0700
On 23 May, 13:26, DRM-Fan <amstereo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 22 May, 23:32, Sean Inglis <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK here we are, wav file would be too big so it's a 256k mp3, gives
you an idea anyway, sorry for dropouts, reception was a bit poor
last night
http://www.uploading.com/files/Q0XBUBHG/1440.mp3.html
That sounds diabolically terrible, IMO - and that's when the signal
hasn't dropped out!
Don't be ridiculous, are you hearing impaired ?!
Could someone else offer their views on the sound quality of this DRM
recording please?
It's just "alright". Not "diabolically terrible". And certainly a step up
from the radio my tiler had blasting away in the kitchen today. He seemed
to be enjoying it. I'd wouldn't bother with that quality om my MP3 player,
podcasts / drama / speech aside.
Also not as good as the original WAV sample; the transcoding didn't do it
any favours, even at 256.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yeah well I thought about uploading the 73 MB wav file, I will do that
if you like though I could'nt tell that much difference if any- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Here it is :-
http://download.yousendit.com/C777A916329CFB1A
.
- References:
- Re: DRM at 23 kbps
- From: DRM-Fan
- Re: DRM at 23 kbps
- Prev by Date: Re: DRM at 23 kbps
- Next by Date: Re: DRM at 23 kbps
- Previous by thread: Re: DRM at 23 kbps
- Next by thread: Re: DRM at 23 kbps
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|