Re: I'm stopping posting
- From: DAB Sounds Better than Steve Gr*** <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 18:17:35 +0100
Richard Evans wrote:
It will be a shame to see you disappear from here but I can see your point. I have been known to simply not open replies from Silk, as he often seem to go out of his way to try and wind me up. Although perhaps he might have started to give up when I don't take the bait. I noticed he didn't bother to reply to one of my posts when I basically said No Comment. I have been tempted to just ignore him, but I have been replying to his posts on the occasions when he seems to be behaving himself.
What a load of old cobblers. I'm not trying to wind anyone up. I just see things from a different point of view. Just because most DAB stations in the UK use inadequate bit-rates does not mean the whole thing is rubbish and deserving of cheap immature jibes. What's the point in that? It achieves nothing.
I have replied to one of his posts today. After he said things like it is nonsense to say that DAB is a poor system, it was hard to let that one go.
If you were to read my posts properly instead of only seeing what you want to see, then you might go some way towards seeing the point I'm trying to make.
I'm not sure whether I'm going to ignore him completely, but I'm
definitely not getting involved in any pointless arguments with him.
The alternative is just endless "me too" posts. Again, what's the point in that?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I'm stopping posting
- From: PR
- Re: I'm stopping posting
- From: Malcolm Knight
- Re: I'm stopping posting
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: I'm stopping posting
- References:
- I'm stopping posting
- From: DAB is the Betamax of digital radio
- Re: I'm stopping posting
- From: Richard Evans
- I'm stopping posting
- Prev by Date: Re: DRM STEREO on 855khz
- Next by Date: Re: Just how good (or not) is error correction on DAB
- Previous by thread: Re: I'm stopping posting
- Next by thread: Re: I'm stopping posting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|