Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Ian Jackson <IanJacksonRemoveThisBit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:17:32 +0100
In message <UTmZh.771$H4.422@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Evans <R.P.Evans.NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Boltar wrote:On 28 Apr, 21:31, Richard L <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Unless of course the cameras had coloured status lights on them.Probably not. Even mere colour-blindness used to be a disqualificationI presume this rule only came in with the introduction of colour
for that particular job, thus ruling out 8 per cent of all male
applicants.
TV? :)
B2003
Richard E.
The BBC certainly gave job applicants a rudimentary colour blindness test in 1964. I suspect is was standard for all electrical engineers who they employed. There's lots beside colour pictures which require adequate colour vision.
Ian.
--
.
- References:
- Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Ken
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Boltar
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Bill Wright
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Boltar
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: DAB is the Betamax of digital radio
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: DAB is the Betamax of digital radio
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Richard L
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Boltar
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Richard Evans
- Why the BBC is rubbish
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone seen this?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- Next by thread: BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|