Re: BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- From: "davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 02:51:40 -0700
On 28 Apr, 13:38, Richard Evans <R.P.Evans.NoS...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
DAB is the Betamax of digital radio wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/brochures/opendays1999/audiocoding.pdf
Interesting how they say that aac provides quite good quality at 256k,
and of course now the BBC uses mp2 at 1/2 that rate. It's hard to see
any logic in thinking that 128k mp2 will be acceptable, when back in
1999 they considered 256k aac as only "quite good".
I think you've misread it.
256kbps AAC was quite good for 5.1 surround sound!
128kbps AAC is excellent for stereo.
I'm fairly sure this is the report they're referring to...
http://www.mp3-tech.org/programmer/docs/w2006.zip
....which is basically BBC R&D saying "please switch to AAC now, mp2
isn't good enough while AAC is excellent".
That's even before they thought about reducing mp2 bitrates to
128kbps!
Cheers,
David.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- References:
- BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- From: DAB is the Betamax of digital radio
- Re: BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- From: Richard Evans
- BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- Prev by Date: Re: Sunday Herald yesterday
- Next by Date: Anyone seen this?
- Previous by thread: Re: BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- Next by thread: Re: BBC R&D's views on AAC in 1999
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|