Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: spam@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:06:58 +0100
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:46:31 GMT, Scott <spiced.porkandham@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:08:32 GMT, "Rayzor" <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Those of us who pay our licence expect a good quality product in
"Ken" <_ken_3_@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p31133h23c67ssitg4do8avcb602ammold@xxxxxxxxxx
The Inquirer
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39193
In technical terms, the BBC used to be a world leader, but even that's
gone down the toilet. The BBC's attitude to digital audio broadcasting
is laughable - the DAB transmission of the high quality Radio 3
is broadcast at a lower resolution than the same channel on digital
terrestrial TV. In most places in the UK, people will get better sound
quality from the ancient FM network than DAB. Progress, eh?
By Andrew Thomas: 26 april 2007, 10:31
Simple salution to you wingers
dont ficking listen to it and it wont hurt you so much
*** heads
return.
You don't pay a licence fee for radio.
MK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Scott
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- References:
- Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Ken
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Rayzor
- Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- From: Scott
- Why the BBC is rubbish
- Prev by Date: Re: Sunday Herald yesterday
- Next by Date: Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- Next by thread: Re: Why the BBC is rubbish
- Index(es):