Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: Richard L <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:35:27 GMT
In message <52mnvrF1p7f99U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Malcolm Knight" <firstinitial.secondinitial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When the technology settles down a bit I shall seriously consider
installing it in place of my DAB tuner. I've a couple of Cat5s installed
there as well as all the aerial cables.
Well, you can do it already through your Dreambox, and so can I.
Unfortunately, my experience of Internet radio is that it can be
amusing to flick through the streams once in a while, but there isn't
anything I actually want to stay with. It's all quantity, not quality.
--
Richard L.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: Malcolm Knight
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- References:
- Update on the Real DAB
- From: Silk
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: Silk
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: Boltar
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: Boltar
- Re: Update on the Real DAB
- From: Malcolm Knight
- Update on the Real DAB
- Prev by Date: Re: Croiset claims 4 = 1
- Next by Date: Re: Update on the Real DAB
- Previous by thread: Re: Update on the Real DAB
- Next by thread: Re: Update on the Real DAB
- Index(es):