Re: Thread about Croiset Lying
- From: Nicolas Croiset <ncroiset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:52:11 +0100
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@dead> wrote :
So you said : INDOOR = OUTDOOR
I used Italy as an example BECAUSE IT IS A NATIONAL NETWORK, and it
perfectly demonstrates how ridiculous your claim is that DVB-H would need to
use 10 MW to 28 MW transmitter power levels.
---> Remember all values I gave was for indoor coverage not outdoor
where you need less power to receive the signal.
Yes, but I'm waiting for you to provide some evidence that DVB-H uses 10 MW
to 28 MW transmitter power levels.
34% of the population is not a national network...
If you put one transmitter every 1km, you don't need 10 or 28MW par
transmitter so your request is ridiculous.
To cover only 34% of the population in indoor with 1000 transmitters is
very high quantity... We use around 3500 TV analog transmitters to cover
100% of superficy of France.
Nicolas Croiset VDL
http://www.vdl.fr/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thread about Croiset Lying
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Thread about Croiset Lying
- References:
- Croiset claims 4 = 1
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Croiset claims 4 = 1
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Croiset claims 4 = 1
- From: Nicolas Croiset
- Thread about Croist Lying
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Thread about Croiset Lying
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Croiset claims 4 = 1
- Prev by Date: Re: DAB bit rates increased in London
- Next by Date: Re: Update on the Real DAB
- Previous by thread: Re: Thread about Croiset Lying
- Next by thread: Re: Thread about Croiset Lying
- Index(es):