Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: Richard L <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:56:56 +0100
In message <oThCg.1182$yG1.79@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tony sayer wrote:
I'll get around to this, as soon as;)
mind you the alberty hall acoustic isn't the best in the world;!...
We don't have to record the Proms, and it would be better if we recorded
something that was high quality, so if you or anyone else has any
suggestions of something that's usually high quality then let me know.
St John's, Smith Square? ;-) But I think perhaps you have
misunderstood Tony: it's just the acoustics of the RAH that are a bit
less than ideal, not the broadcasts themselves. Why not have a listen
tonight and see whether they bother you?
--
Richard L.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- References:
- Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: Nick Hopton
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: tony sayer
- Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- Prev by Date: Poor old GCap
- Next by Date: Re: DAB aerial. Is this outright wrong?
- Previous by thread: Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- Next by thread: Re: Could someone record R3 on satellite?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|