Re: Just out of interest..
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxx (Don Pearce)
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:29:52 GMT
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:28:40 +0200, hwh <iimeeltje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:None whatever. CDs simply wouldn't work if there were any kind of a
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:16:19 +0200, hwh <iimeeltje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
There is no reason that any sampling rate over 44.1kHz should improveEven if the music countains say 19, 8,, 4 and 1 kHz tones at the same
anything. All audible information, both amplitude and phase, are
preserved in that regime.
time? We know 19 kHz can be coded with 44,1 kHz sampling, but how about
the sum of the above frequencies?
gr, hwh
What do you mean by sum? Do you mean the mathematical sum - ie 32kHz?
If so, it isn't there in the music. If you mean can all of those be
faithfully reproduced simultaneously, then yes - they certainly are.
Digital sampling really doesn't care what shape waveform it is
reproducing.
The latter. So 19 kHz with other 'tones' superimposed on it are no
problem at all?
problem.
d
--
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
.
- References:
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: Roderick Stewart
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: Roderick Stewart
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: Don Pearce
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: hwh
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: Don Pearce
- Re: Just out of interest..
- From: hwh
- Re: Just out of interest..
- Prev by Date: Re: Just out of interest..
- Next by Date: Re: Just out of interest..
- Previous by thread: Re: Just out of interest..
- Next by thread: Re: Just out of interest..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|