Re: DRM+ Favoured in Germany

In article <wSlcg.27$c76.11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
DAB sounds worse than FM <dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
charles wrote:
In article <g7lcg.7623$BD2.2550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,


That specifically states "A study commissioned by the German state
regulating authorities", i.e. plural not single of authority, which
suggests that they've all cooperated and DRM+ is kicking ass already.

or it could just reflect the reality of the situation that each state
(Land) has a separate regulating authority.


It also says "the German state regulating authorities", which suggests
that it's all of them, because if it was only some of them it shouldn't
have said "*the* German state ....".

Yes, it says all the states commisioned the report. It doesn't say how
many of them accepted the result. You assume it is all of them, I don't
know whether that is the case, it isn't clear from your posting.

--
From KT24 - in drought-ridden Surrey

Using a RISC OS5 computer
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DRM+ Favoured in Germany
    ... suggests that they've all cooperated and DRM+ is kicking ass already. ... Using a RISC OS5 computer ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: DRM+ Favoured in Germany
    ... suggests that they've all cooperated and DRM+ is kicking ass already. ... It also says "the German state regulating authorities", ...
    (alt.radio.digital)