Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- From: "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:53:07 GMT
Don Pearce wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 16:26:51 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
<dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 15:57:22 GMT, "DAB sounds worse than FM"
<dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don Pearce wrote:
On 15 May 2006 08:03:34 -0700, Lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
NEW VOICEOVER COMPANY FOR DAB NETWORK RADIO STATION IMAGEING
CHECK OUT ARE WEBSITE GREAT DEALS ON SWEEPER PACKS NEW CLIENTS
FREE SWEEPERS NOW...DEMOS ON SITE FEED BACK FORUM TOO TO JOIN GO
TO OUR WEBSITE WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
So would you use this company? I am filled with such confidence by
this ad.......
I'm sure commercial radio will use them, COS THEY'RE GONNA BE LOUD!
But they won't be able to spell "they're".
They can't spell "imaging" either.
They have at least nine errors in those three lines.
I don't want to read it again in case I get a headache. ;-)
--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info
Find the cheapest Freeview & DAB prices:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/freeview/freeview_receivers.php
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/dab/dab_radios.php
.
- References:
- WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- From: Lee
- Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- From: Don Pearce
- Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- From: Don Pearce
- Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- From: Don Pearce
- WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- Prev by Date: Re: Pocket DAB reception
- Next by Date: Re: Pocket DAB reception
- Previous by thread: Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- Next by thread: Re: WWW.VOICETRACKERS.CO.UK
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
