Re: Digital radio news site?
- From: "Nick" <nick.hall1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:10:26 -0000
"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:KbKCf.15668$mf2.3941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Graculus wrote:
>> "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:wvqCf.11340$Y6.8089@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Gopher wrote:
>>>> Sorry, I was looking for an objective site. But thanks anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>> My website is objective. In fact, it's the only objective website on
>>> the subject of digital radio because I've not seen any of the other
>>> UK digital radio websites admit that DAB sounds worse than FM, so
>>> how on earth could they possibly claim to be objective?
>>
>> Idiot! Your moniker says it all. By declaring DSWTFM, you are being
>> subjective, or at the very least antagonistic, from the outset.
>
>
> When does something cease being subjective and become objective? I'd say
> that if you carried out a blind listening test (which are standardised by
> the relevant bodies, BTW) and you can say that statistically DAB sounds
> worse than FM then DAB does sound worse than FM. And believe me, the
> results of such a test wouldn't even be close if you compared DAB at
> 128kbps with FM. And 98% of stereo stations on DAB do use 128kbps.
>
> Basically, I'm stating a fact. Idiot!
So it isn't a fact it is only your view.
>
>> Your viewpoint is the opposite of that of the DAB industry and its
>> supporters and as such, makes it as subjective as theirs.
>
>
> The DAB industry and supporters are simply wrong. End of story.
In your view.
>
>> It is not
>> balanced, and putting the case for both sides (letting you draw your
>> conclusions).
>
>
> I'm stating facts.
>
No you're stating your views which are so obviously one sided you fall into
a the trap of giving your website as an objective one.
Nick
>
> --
> Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info
>
> Find the cheapest Freeview & DAB prices:
> http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/freeview_receivers.htm
> http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/dab_radios.htm
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Digital radio news site?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Digital radio news site?
- References:
- Digital radio news site?
- From: Gopher
- Re: Digital radio news site?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Digital radio news site?
- From: Gopher
- Re: Digital radio news site?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Digital radio news site?
- From: Graculus
- Re: Digital radio news site?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Digital radio news site?
- Prev by Date: Re: TalkSport FTA
- Next by Date: Re: DAB crap on radio 4 (says speaker on just a minute)
- Previous by thread: Re: Digital radio news site?
- Next by thread: Re: Digital radio news site?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|