Re: Urge

"DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kdpwf.25671$r4.72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Chris Wyatt wrote:
>> 128 Kbps WMA isn't CD quality, WMA artifacting is shit, even at 128
>> Kbps.
>
> Who are you replying to?

Hello "DAB sounds worse than FM",

>From his post headers:

References: <43bfd9ce$0$46996$edfadb0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<S9Tvf.2102$s65.1911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I note you are using Outlook Express 6 (the same as me) - perhaps you should
switch it to threaded view?

Threaded view clearly shows who is replying to who.

Regards,
Mr. Harris.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Urge
    ... > 128 Kbps WMA isn't CD quality, WMA artifacting is shit, even at 128 ... Who are you replying to? ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Urge
    ... 128 Kbps WMA isn't CD quality, WMA artifacting is shit, even at 128 ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Low Voltage Cutoff Circuit
    ... >shit to people in person. ... >you more and more, which is quite entertaining, and the only reason I've ... >been replying to you thus far. ... I just feign annoyance to set the hook, and the only reason ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Hey, Killer
    ... What part of replying to your shit that you start don't you get? ... are the one acting like the victim if anyone replies to your retarded ...
    (rec.music.artists.kiss)
  • Re: Customer du jour
    ... >>> shoes. ... i shit you not. ... >>not his mother tongue and who said that he is not proud about his ... As I saw it through your reply, he was replying to me... ...
    (rec.collecting.coins)