Re: "crystal-clear reception"
- From: "Graculus" <ReplaceWithMyMoniker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:38:18 +0100
"No-One" <no_one_2k@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:435eaa0f$0$356$da0feed9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Mike O'Sullivan" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3s4nacFmgilvU2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Just this minute heard a Pure DAB radio described as providing
>> "Crystal-Clear" reception, much better than FM. This is The Gadget Show
>> on Channel 5.
>>
>> Ho-hum!
>
> "Crystal-Clear reception". Are they referring to overall signal coverage?
> i.e a clear signal will mean no break up etc. Or was were they reffering
> to the sound itself?
Deliberately vague in that respect, so that the "masses" assume that just
because you don't get the hiss of FM when signal is poor (or AM at any
time), then the audio quality must be great. Same as if you mention Al Qaeda
and Saddam Hussein in the same or adjacent sentences often enough, people
will assume a connection even if there isn't one.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "crystal-clear reception"
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: "crystal-clear reception"
- References:
- "crystal-clear reception"
- From: Mike O'Sullivan
- Re: "crystal-clear reception"
- From: No-One
- "crystal-clear reception"
- Prev by Date: Re: MediaGuardian Calculators Don't Work - Again
- Next by Date: Re: "crystal-clear reception"
- Previous by thread: Re: "crystal-clear reception"
- Next by thread: Re: "crystal-clear reception"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
