Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: steve41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 24 Oct 2005 11:16:35 -0700
seani wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:19:00 +0000, DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
>
> > seani wrote:
> >> Nicely sidestepped.
> >
> >
> > Nicely side-stepped? Nicely side-stepped? What? What are you going on
> > about?
> >
> > I was asked this:
> >
> > "Could you tell us who you are please, and which part of the industry
> > you work in?"
> >
> > I responded by giving my name and saying that I was not part of THE
> > industry (THE industry being THE RADIO industry). Okay?
> >
> >
>
> *No* you did *not*. You responded with:
>
> "My name is Steven Green and I do not work in the DAB industry. Quid pro
> quo, Clarice."
>
> *You* narrowed the phrase. I didn't. andyp didn't.
He said "the industry". Now, with all your powers of observation, which
industry do you think he was referring to? The spectacly-making
industry, perhaps?
> I *believe* that your intention was to imply that you worked in
> some related industry, when in fact you do not, and you have no commercial
> experience.
So, you BELIEVE you know what MY intention was? End of argument. Go and
play on the motorway.
> >> But of course the question referred to "the industry",
> >
> >
> > That wouldn't make sense. And you are just trying to twist things AGAIN.
>
> Not at all. Your usual accusatory bleat won't help, when the original post
> is just a click away. How is *accurately* stating the terms of the
> question twisting?
I BELIEVED that he was referring to the RADIO INDUSTRY. I'm afraid I
know what I thought, and unless you literally can read my mind then you
haven't got a leg to stand on.
> My reading is that andyp asked you which part of the industry you work in,
> specifically to pin you down on your practical experience.
So, not only are you claiming YOU CAN READ MY MIND, but you are also
claiming YOU CAN READ ANDYP'S MIND AS WELL!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!
As you can read my mind, here's a test for you:
What is my magazine column going to be about in the forthcoming issue?
In particular, who is it criticising?
> Rather than
> admit that you have no practical commercial experience in the DAB, other
> Digital Radio, Broadcasting, Electrical/Electronic Engineering,
> Telecommunications or related industries, you altered the terms of the
> question to avoid having to admit this. Changing it in this way allows you
> to avoid the admission and leaves a false impression.
>
> Of course this may not have been his intention.
Sean, I answered his question in good faith. I freely admit that I
cannot read people's minds, and I don't believe in UFOs either, or
alien abductions -- they're for feeble-minded types. I thought he was
referring to the RADIO industry when he said THE industry, as you would
think he was referring to when we're on a digital radio newsgroup
discussing digital radio. Naa wot a mean, Harry?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: seani
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- References:
- David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: Raoul
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: andyp
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: seani
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- From: seani
- David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- Prev by Date: BBC London 94.9 appears on Sky EPG
- Next by Date: Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- Previous by thread: Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- Next by thread: Re: David Robinson Letter on Feedback
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|