Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!


"Pierre PANTALÉON" <000pipantal@xxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:435be7f8$0$1464$636a15ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> hwh a écrit :
>> "Pierre PANTALÉON" <000pipantal@xxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
>> news:435b8cde$0$2168$626a14ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>hwh a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>>For a bitrate as low as 112 kbps, they should consider using the 24kHz
>>>>sampling mode.
>>>
>>>No
>>
>>
>> Why? at 24 kHz no bits would be spoiled trying hopelessly to reproduce
>> high
>> frequencies at a bitrate that is too low to get reasonable audio.
>
> Are you really listen to a mp2 sound at 48 kHz with bitrate at 112 kbps?

That appears to be what the broadcasters will pour down on us. I think I
don't want to hear it, as 128 kbps is, even using new encoders, quite
hopeless.

gr, hwh


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just out of interest..
    ... preserved in that regime. ... We know 19 kHz can be coded with 44,1 kHz sampling, but how about the sum of the above frequencies? ... gr, hwh ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
    ... Sorcerer wrote: ... | A hopeless case, ... | you reproduce in babblespeak someone else's guess. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: BBC WS on 648 KHz closing
    ... On 3/15/11 8:29 PM, Bill Wright wrote: ... I mean 198 kHz of course;) ... is grossly incorrect;) ... gr, hwh ...
    (uk.tech.broadcast)
  • Re: Just out of interest..
    ... frequencies up to 96 kHz (which is standard for AAC) and up to 32-bit: ... gr, hwh ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Special Relativity is Dead!
    ... | A hopeless case, ... | you reproduce in babblespeak someone else's guess. ... BTW, Design one of these ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)