Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!


<davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:1129821651.314479.313460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 112kbps mp2 sounds like this...
> http://www.david.robinson.org/audio/geniecut.mp2
> though for DAB, it will be 48kHz, not 44.1k - which will actually make
> it sound worse.

For a bitrate as low as 112 kbps, they should consider using the 24kHz
sampling mode.

gr, hwh


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
    ... >>> For a bitrate as low as 112 kbps, ... > 112k sounds dreadful for 48Khz stereo, clearly the bit rate just isn't ... yes, i think so, but my test don't give sound so bad. ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: Why do R1 & R2 FM sound so bad
    ... They why does it sound so bad in the UK? ... even at 128 kbps. ... their counterparts from the NOS at the same bitrate. ... NOS must be using wundacoders that provide CD-quality at 0 kbps. ...
    (uk.tech.broadcast)
  • Re: Why do R1 & R2 FM sound so bad
    ... They already use separate processing for DAB and FM. ... They why does it sound so bad in the UK? ... But the best sounding 128 kbps stations will still sound shit no matter what country you listen to them in. ... BBC 1 and 2 don't come close to their counterparts from the NOS at the same bitrate. ...
    (uk.tech.broadcast)
  • Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
    ... > For a bitrate as low as 112 kbps, they should consider using the 24kHz ... > sampling mode. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.radio.digital)
  • Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
    ... > hwh a écrit: ... >> For a bitrate as low as 112 kbps, they should consider using the 24kHz ... >> sampling mode. ... frequencies at a bitrate that is too low to get reasonable audio. ...
    (alt.radio.digital)