Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- From: "davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <davidrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Oct 2005 08:20:51 -0700
DAB sounds worse than FM wrote:
> http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/samples/century_nw_112k.mp4 (605 KB)
>
> Now I defy anybody to say that that is transparent. Admittedly, if you
> owned a DAB portable radio then it might sound great, but on my hi-fi
> system that sounds crap.
I don't get the joke.
(It's an 80kbps 16kHz sampled AAC file, for anyone who didn't notice)
112kbps mp2 sounds like this...
http://www.david.robinson.org/audio/geniecut.mp2
though for DAB, it will be 48kHz, not 44.1k - which will actually make
it sound worse.
Cheers,
David.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- From: hwh
- Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- References:
- First 112kbps station audio sample!
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- First 112kbps station audio sample!
- Prev by Date: Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- Next by Date: Re: Ofcom Reduce the Minimum Bit Rates to 112kbps
- Previous by thread: Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- Next by thread: Re: First 112kbps station audio sample!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|