Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: tony sayer <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:35:15 +0100
In article <1128541503.550041.75300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
conkersack@xxxxxxxxx writes
>> At the end of the day, it is obvious how crap DAB sounds.
>
>Agreed. <ego massage> I visted your site </ego massage> and followed
>the link to the AAC+ streaming links thing and I've got to say, I was
>mightily impressed with the quality of sound for the bitrates. If all
>radio transmissions became digital in the future (and used this AAC+),
>and were broadcast from a satellite, how big would a portable radio
>have to be? I mean, would they ever get to the size of pocket FM radios
>we have today?
>
>I've always wondered why the BBC and other terrestrial braodcasters
>didn't just bite the bullet and scrap the transmitters on the hills
>like winter hill and have all TV and radio broadcast from a satellite
>or two, or am I being too simplistic?
>
Yes if you don't mind listing outdoors with an aerial on yer head, but
it wont work too well indoors!...
--
Tony Sayer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- References:
- "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: conkersack
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: conkersack
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: conkersack
- "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Prev by Date: Re: ASA Rules DAB Quality Claims 'Misleading'
- Next by Date: Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Previous by thread: Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Next by thread: Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|