Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: "DAB sounds worse than FM" <dab.is@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:01:52 GMT
conkersack@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> FM still wipes the floor with DAB, so stick with that.
>
> Yep, I do. My ipod-alike has it's songs encoded at 192kbps vbr (or
> whatever it should be properly called)
Yes, VBR is the correct term.
> and that is miles better than
> dab,
Absolutely. DAB uses MP2, and MP2 at 128kbps is approximately equivalent
to 80kbps or 96kbps MP3. Nobody ever encodes MP3s to 80kbps or 96kbps,
and that shows what a disgrace DAB is.
> which is frankly hideous for most songs - it burbles like they
> are being played from a half submerged speaker.
>
> I haven't got the worlds greatest ears but I can tell what sounds crap
> and what sounds acceptable.
At the end of the day, it is obvious how crap DAB sounds.
--
Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info
Please sign the petition asking the BBC to provide better audio quality
on its radio stations on DAB, Freeview, satellite and cable:
http://tinyurl.com/a68e4
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: conkersack
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- References:
- "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: conkersack
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- From: conkersack
- "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Prev by Date: Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Next by Date: Another Simon Nelson Lie
- Previous by thread: Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Next by thread: Re: "Debate" about DAB on Radio 4 Now
- Index(es):