Re: Buffering?
- From: Richard L <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 07:35:13 +0100
In message <NZg0f.8643$hP.5403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Richard Evans <R.P.Evans.NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > In the event of hurricane, flooding, national strikes, war or nuclear
> > winter, hi-fi reception would be fairly low down the list of national
> > priorities, and so a dial-up ISDN line (if still working) would
> > probably be quite sufficient.
>
> I presume you mean ISDN-30. If that still exists, then it would probably
> do the job.
No, I meant Basic Rate ISDN. In the event of the above extreme
situations, we'd presumably be reduced to a single speech service
mainly carrying news and information.
> I reckon a satellite link could also make it much easier to set up lots
> of extra small fill in transmitters. Installing Satellite receiver
> dishes would be a lot cheaper than installing land based comm lines to
> every small TX site.
That is undoubtedly what goes on in France, and must be the reason why
all their FM stations are carried by Astra 1.
--
Richard L.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Buffering?
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: Buffering?
- References:
- Buffering?
- From: Steve W
- Re: Buffering?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Buffering?
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: Buffering?
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: Buffering?
- From: Richard L
- Re: Buffering?
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: Buffering?
- From: Richard L
- Buffering?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ultra-ultra Low Quality Mobile TV via DAB
- Next by Date: Re: BBC expands DAB footprint by 1.2 million
- Previous by thread: Re: Buffering?
- Next by thread: Re: Buffering?
- Index(es):