Re: mp2 + sbr
- From: Pierre PANTALÉON <000pipantal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:44:45 +0200
DAB sounds worse than FM a écrit :
As I said, a listening test in October 2004 showed that Layer 2+SBR performs poorly:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/Subjective_Evaluation_of_Layer_II_with_SBR.pdf (360 KB)
page 8, Conclusions:
"The results indicate that at 128 kbps, the performance of the single rate Layer II + SBR codec was equivalent to the ITIS hardware Layer II codec. At 160 kbps however, Layer II + SBR codec performed significantly poorer than the ITIS hardware Layer II codec. The subjective performance of the single rate Layer II + SBR codec at 160 kbps was equivalent to the performance of the ITIS hardware Layer II codec operating at 128 kbps."
i.e. Layer 2+SBR actually performs worse or no better than Layer 2 on its own!
After test with very good encoder, mp2 can have cut frequency near 20 kHz. SBR isn't needed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: mp2 + sbr
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: mp2 + sbr
- References:
- mp2 + sbr
- From: Pierre PANTALÉON
- Re: mp2 + sbr
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: mp2 + sbr
- From: Pierre PANTALÉON
- Re: mp2 + sbr
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- mp2 + sbr
- Prev by Date: Don Messer - Fulltime for the DRM techin
- Next by Date: Re: mp2 + sbr
- Previous by thread: Re: mp2 + sbr
- Next by thread: Re: mp2 + sbr
- Index(es):