Re: AM stereo
- From: "John" <JohnZIZnospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:31:49 +0000 (UTC)
Anorak wrote:
> > > ..also we could have easity has am stereo on the UK. In the files
> > > section of my amstereoforumeurope group there's a rec from LBC
> > > back on 1989 about possible introduction of the mode..
> > >
> > > Thanks to the narrow mindedness of the RA we never got it of
> > > course. AMS would have worked well in the UK though. France Blue
> > > anyone should get at night in the UK on 864khz, try the 2 radio
> > > trick with both slightly off tune from each other and you'll hear
> > > the stereo
> > >
> > > Hear a few samples at www.amstereoradio.tk
> >
> >
> > Do you know why it was rejected ?
> >
>
> They were worried about potential interference to adjacent stations,
> of course this is complete hogwash as a c-quam station would cause no
> more interference than a non -cquam / mono station.
I have been trying to remember any experiments from around that time
I cannot remember anything to do with C-Quam, except reading a technical
description which said it required the transmitter RF drives to be
changed for C-Quam ones. But as to how this would have worked with the
IBA's highly efficient transmitters which were new at the time, I don't
know. But I suspect it wouldn't have worked.
J
.
- References:
- OT: AM stereo
- From: Scott
- Re: AM stereo
- From: DAB sounds worse than FM
- Re: AM stereo
- From: Scott
- Re: AM stereo
- From: Richard Evans
- Re: AM stereo
- From: hwh
- Re: AM stereo
- From: John
- Re: AM stereo
- From: Anorak
- OT: AM stereo
- Prev by Date: Re: AM stereo
- Next by Date: Re: AM stereo
- Previous by thread: Re: AM stereo
- Next by thread: Re: AM stereo
- Index(es):