Re: New version of Truecrypt released (6.1a)

Ari <DROPTheJooseIsLoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:gi4mqa$rfp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Once again my position is clear: There is NO public evidence that
Truecrypt's source code has been subjected to independent competent
thorough review and testing.

It is you and others who are so eager to jump to all sorts of ridiculous
inferences and conclusions from there. Fine by me - as long as you don't
try to drag me along for the ride.

Regards,


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New version of Truecrypt released (6.1a)
    ... Once again my position is clear: There is NO public evidence that ... Truecrypt's source code has been subjected to independent competent ... thorough review and testing. ...
    (alt.privacy)
  • Re: New version of Truecrypt released (6.1a)
    ... ..thus failing nemo_outis's requirement of "source code that is known ... to have had a thorough review by competent people." ... Truecrypt's source code not having had thorough competent ... independent review. ...
    (alt.privacy)
  • Re: New version of Truecrypt released (6.1a)
    ... There is NO public evidence that Truecrypt's source code has ... been subjected to independent competent thorough review and testing. ...
    (alt.privacy)
  • Re: New version of Truecrypt released (6.1a)
    ... There is NO public evidence that Truecrypt's source code has ... been subjected to independent competent thorough review and testing. ...
    (alt.privacy)