Re: Web and Usenet Surfing Best Cost Effective Solution?
- From: macarro <email@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:47:21 +0100
SSelfPity wrote:
They offer a New service Privacy at Broadband speeds?
Is it worth it they do keep logs for 5 days so they say.
I prefer an honest provider that is clear about their logs policy than a false sense of security with someone who claims no logs and then keep logs for an undetermined time.
The best way is to use "Onion" peeling method Tor this is extremely
slow
I agree, it is not practical for downloads, for text posts Tor it is the best and free.
then there is "Clouds" by Att& T research
Not sure on this one seems extremely complicated.
I have just googled for this very briefly and the info I found looks like a Denial of Service protection for business, nothing to do with privacy, if you have a better link with other info please provide it.
Secursurf by Securestar for 80 Euros a year I am told this can be
slow.
Usenetserver for Usenet encryted.
You can simply use any usenet provider, even without SSL, as long as you use a them over a VPN
Anyone know whats the best solution without tremedous complication and
expense?
I have tried Steganos VPN myself (http://www.steganos.com) I have tried it for Usenet and I am satisfied with the speed and reliability, I can't
tell you the prices because they keep changing them and I tried it over a year ago. It only works in Widows.
SSelfPity
--
Customized News: http://news.spotback.com
.
- References:
- Web and Usenet Surfing Best Cost Effective Solution?
- From: SSelfPity
- Web and Usenet Surfing Best Cost Effective Solution?
- Prev by Date: Re: Web and Usenet Surfing Best Cost Effective Solution?
- Next by Date: Opinions on Guardster?
- Previous by thread: Re: Web and Usenet Surfing Best Cost Effective Solution?
- Next by thread: Re: Web and Usenet Surfing Best Cost Effective Solution?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|