Re: Letter
- From: George Orwell <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:10:44 +0100 (CET)
None wrote:
If anything, "email" has proved to be precisely the opposite of your
worries. And in any case that's mostly academic to the discussion
because I clearly stated that this affected only bulk, commercial email,
and needed a workable "opt out" attached to it. If the
Commercial Email should NEVER be sent un-solicited, period. All commercial
Email should ALWAYS be "double opt in" to insure that ONLY the people who
want it will get it.
Can't disagree with you there. In fact I said right from the start that
the ONLY valid argument against this "Pay-Per-SPAM" scheme was one based
on the premise that all SPAM is evil.
The "opt out" thingy was more a matter of living in the real world where
we all know SPAM will prevail... a common sense, middle ground addition
to a less than Utopian situation. ;)
.
- References:
- Re: Letter
- From: None
- Re: Letter
- Prev by Date: Re: Letter
- Next by Date: Beware of "PowerPrivacy.com"
- Previous by thread: Re: Letter
- Next by thread: Re: Letter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|