- From: Anonymous via Panta Rhei <anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Oct 2005 23:20:33 -0000
"Thanks to all for this interesting discussion, it is always difficult
to decide what company will provide the best privacy. I admit that I
was fooled into believing privacy.li until I read Schneiers comments
about them, in the end you have to trust someone, and one of the
persorns with most prestige in the world in cryptology is someone.
Besides I have read from more or less reliable sources accounts of
people using privacy.li services with no problems, perhaps if they were
a big scale fraud operation someone would report them up in public
forums... Well I stick for what I know, I am not expert in crypto, so I
will follow what most people who earn a living with this say, I am
pretty sure it's not personal."
Posted by: melic at September 16, 2005 09:53 AM
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
- Prev by Date: Nazi Skinheads Endorse privacy.li
- Next by Date: privacy.li Conspiracy KOOKS
- Previous by thread: [INFO] privacy.li
- Next by thread: Re: [INFO] privacy.li