Where is the outrage over MASSIVE GOP VOTER FRAUD in Virginia???




The larger question being ignored in the "Newt didn't qualify for the
Va primary" story is the OBVIOUS MASSIVE Voter Fraud that went into
his failed effort.

To qualify for the Virginia primary, Newt's organization had to
collect 10,000 verifiable signatures from real voters.

News reports state that Newt submitted roughly 11,000 plus signatures
and the election officials were unable to confirm at least 10,000 of
these were valid qualifying voters. I have not yet heard any numbers
on how many were disqualified, but, at least over 1,000 were
disqualified.


Let's do the math: At least 1,000 out of 11,000 were phony
signatures. This means at a minimum that 9 - 10 percent of the
signatures Newt's people gathered were fraudulent.

According to Fact-Check.org (the REPUBLICAN funded truth seeking site)
they looked into all forms of voter fraud during the peak of the
dreaded ACORN scandals and discovered the Bush Admin had aggressively
pursued cases of any form of voter fraud . . . in fact this effort was
behind the infamous firing of nine Federal US Attorneys.

**They discovered, prosecuted and convicted 70 people on voter fraud
in the 2006 federal election cycle

**FEC records for 2006 show 80,454,673 valid votes were counted for
federal office (ignores state and local voting) in that cycle.

**THAT's a 0.000009% rate of REPUBLICAN PROVEN VOTE FRAUD nationwide.

**Other reliable voter advocate sources have put the overall
conviction rate for voter fraud over the last decade at roughly half
this rate - 0.000005% across over 550,000,000 votes cast.

So -- we find that normal "voter fraud" involves somewhere between
0.000005% and 0.000009% of the votes cast.

Meanwhile, Newt's people committed fraud at the rate of 10 percent AT
A MINIMUM.

That's 111,111 times greater than the norm!!!

That's 3,700 times greater than was alleged but never proven against
the dreaded ACORN



WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE FROM THE "SELF-APPOINTED PROTECTORS OF DEMOCRACY?

.