Re: Compare baseball pitching style: Bush vs Obama

On Jul 16, 9:12 pm, Bert Byfield <bertbyfi...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You bigots must always -- and rightly -- be expecting the racist
card.
We expect it anytime someone points out your Messiah's
shortcoming.

Of course. That's because your "pointing out" consists of calling his
wife "baboon arms" and such.

Point out where I've ever made a comment about Michelle Obama's arms,
and you may have a point. But you can't, so you don't.

You addled little brain thinks that anyone
dissagreeing with Obama must be 'racist'.

Just because you think "addled" is a big word does not get you off
the racist platform.

You've yet to present any proof to support your Race Card. Failure to
do so means it's bull***.

It just demonstrates your inability to face reality.

Just calling everyone crazy that points out your racism does not make
you civilized.

Again, you've yet to provide any evidence to support your race card.
Pointing out that people who whip out the Race Card against anyone who
dissagrees with Obama are incapable rational thought is a fun past
time.

Basically only you bigots think someone calling you on it means
they have "lost the argument."
No, basically us intelligent individuals who dislike Obama based
on his history, his actions and his policies KNOW it means you
have "lost the argument."

He has no history yet.

Actually, he does. He has a history of corruption in Chicago politics
(in the most corrupt city, he was at the top). He has a history of
one of the most liberal Senators (and voted THE most liberal one
year). And, in his short time as President, he has a history of
raising taxes on the most productive of society, proposing socialist
programs and is projected to quadruple the deficit in only ONE year.

BTW, did you happen to catch the recent Congressional Budget Office
Report where they stated, "Under current law, the federal budget is on
an unsustainable path—meaning that federal debt will continue to grow
much faster than the economy over the long run."-Statement of Douglas
W. Elmendorf, Director of CBO before the Committee on the Budget
United States Senate-July 16, 2009

He is murdering arabs just the way you
Republicans like it. He is spending government money just the way
Bush did, on credit.

He spending money, but he far surpasses Bush in quantities.

You have no reason to dislike Obama other than
your racism. Not yet. So you stand exposed.

I explained exactly why I dislike Obama (see above) and none of them
have anything to do with race. So your bull*** is labeled
'bull***'. He's been in the public spotlight and demonstrated what
his policies are enough for people to dislike them on their merits.

"Not Yet"??? So exactly how long of his proposing of raising my
taxes, of increasing my gas, water and light bills, of his outrageous
lies, and of his bull*** do we have to put up with before we can
officially dislike him without it being racial. (Seeing as he will
always be disliked, to you it will always be racial, as you have no
serious arguments to offer.)

It's the redneck version of the nazis' Godwin's Law.
Well, seeing as I never mentioned his race, or ever once said 'he
throws like a black guy', or even hinted at his skin color even
once...

You manage to make your feelings known. You only imagine you are
being subtle.

Ahhh, there's the rub. You can't actually point to ANY of my
arguments that mention race, so you have to fall on the old "WE know
what you mean" tactic. It must be nice to be the sole definer of
other people's inner thoughts.

Again, dip***, argue WHAT I WRITE, not what you mistakenly 'feel' I'm
complaining about. My bet is that you are incapable of doing so. (Of
course you're incapable of doing so...that's why you must rely on the
Race Card).

Typical lib...can't argue the facts, so you make up ***.

the fact that you decided to call me Racist can only be
attributed to an insecurity in your argument, thus an admission of
defeat.

Nice try, still no cigar.

And still no proof from you. Damn it man, at least make an ATTEMPT at
a rational argument.

Now, if you can point to where anything I said had to do with his
race, and not his policies or even his throwing ability, you
might, JUST might, have a valid reason.

You are not fooling anyone, you know.

And still no proof from you. You still can not point to anything I've
said that is racist. Still having to imagine racism so that you wont
have to strain your brain attempting rational thoiught.

Again, point to WHERE I mentioned his race, dip***.

But seeing as you can't
and you don't, it's natural to assume you have no valid point and
it's just a conditioned response, just like Pavlov's dog.

You bigots get ugly when you lose on logic. And you lose on logic all
the time.

The only problem with that argument, dip***, is that you've PROVIDED
no logic. So far, your entire case has been, "I must assume you're a
racist so that I don't have to reveal how weak my logic really is. I
can't point out where you 'said' any racist, but you 'must' be
racist."

Pathetic.

Politicians loot
the treasury from both sides of the aisle, and then they can't
manage the economy anyway, golly who thought they could fail to
manage the economy? It's easy to manage an economy. The Russians
did it for 70 years.
Sure...they did a REAL good job.  Besides the purges of the
dissidents (read: millions killed),

Latest estimates are down from 30,000,000 to 20,000,000.

Oh, okay, only 20 million. A regular Shangra La.

terror, starving towns and
villages, impoverishment, oppression, poverty, only 5.6 square
meters of living space alloted per person (that's average, some
districts had what was known as the "coffin-standard"), 10+ year
waiting list for apartments,  mandatory military service, famine,
injustice, represssions, needing permission to change jobs,
criminal prosecution for tardiness or absenteeism, constant
surveillance, internal passports, food-lines, hoarding, curtailed
travel, black-market food, only 20% of rural hospitals having
hot-running water, having to buy medications on the black market,
and all around misery....it was a freakin paradise.

All true, but it WAS a paradise for the government people. They had
private stores (no working class stiffs may enter) and all sorts of
perks.

Seeing as I did not mention, or even infer, his skin color, your
whipping out of the Race Card is demonstrated as a knee-jerk
reaction of a kool-aid drinker.

Your fascination with poisoned koolaid identifies you as not only a
bigot, but a full nazi mentality.

And you'll have as much luck pointing out my nazi speech as you have
my racists comments.

"Kool-aid Drinker-Someone who beleives what they are told without
thinking for themselves."

It would have been, except for the fact that he didn't fight a
'pointless' war.  Seeing as your are wrong about that, the rest of
your statement means nada.

And the point of the Iraq war was? <<< crickets... >>>

Try reading the ' Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United
States Armed Forces Against Iraq'. Just a few of the reasons given:
-Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 cease fire,
including interference with weapons inspectors
-Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."
-Iraq's "continu[ing] to aid and harbor other international terrorist
organizations,"
- the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998

Learn to do a little research.

In real life, when Obama speaks, people listen.
The only people who listen are those who have always hated America
and enjoy watching this ass-wipe apologizing for his country, and
laughing behind his back.

Your obsession with people laughing behind backs identifies you as
paranoid. Keep exposing your problems.

So, to you, mentioning something once constitutes an 'obsession'.
Damn, idiot, you're really stretching in your desperation.

That never happened to Bush.
Sure it did.  And they listened reallly well because he had
demonstrated a tendancy to back up his threats.

Bush didn't back up anything. He just murdered 1,000,000 innocent
people and you LIKED it.

Damn, ass-wipe, if you're going to lie, at least make it believable.
Actual numbers of casualties, including Iraqi, Coalition and
Contractor are actually closer to 50,000. Different stuidies might
give you 150,000. Do you always multiply your data by 5? Or do you
just pull numbers out of your ass?

That alone makes you a nazi.

Ahh, now we have 'Racist' and 'Nazi'. What next? 'Bigot'?
'Homophobe'? 'Pencil-neck Geek'?

Damn it man, argue what I WRITE.. (Oh, that's right...you can't)

It's not a
fucking popularity contest.  Other leaders may not have liked him,
but I can gurantee many more respected him than they do The
Apologist.  Yol Bolsun, Grendel.

Your guarantees are worthless.

And for that, I get called 'racist' by small minded individuals,
such as yourself.

If you are not a racist, then why do you spend so much time denying
it?

Damn, but that's fucked up logic. By that same 'logic' (as in 'none'),
if you call me a Polar Bear, and I state catagorically that I'm not
and point out that you can't prove that I am, I am automatically a
Polar Bear because I deny it.

Dude, you're fucked.

Why do you spend so much time harping on it (and 'obsession' in your
lingo)? Because YOU HAVE NOTHING ELSE. You can't argue the FACTS.
You can't argue what I WRITE.

Okay, take the test: Would you let a black guy date your sister?

I don't 'let' anyone date my sister, as she is capable of making up
her own mind. The only guy she dated that I didn't like was an
Italian, and it had nothing to with him being Italian and everything
to do with his being an ***.

How about this for your 'test'. In my life I have dated: Caucasian
girls, Vietnamese girl, Latino girls, Puerto Rican girls , Black girl,
Blondes, Brunettes and Red-heads. Of all these, the only I really had
a problem with was the Vietnamese, as she wanted to get married and I
really didn't want to adopt an 80 person family.(and the mexican chick
was psycho).

Of course, to you I will always be 'racist' as it's the only argument
you have.

Pitifull. Why not try and argue something I've actually said? You're
incapable.

Yol Bolsun,
Grendel.

"I'm not cynical, just experienced."
.

Loading