Re: ! 'Bryan Olson' Caught LYING...

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:44:07 -0800, Bryan Olson
<fakeaddress@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Patriot Games wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:07:31 -0800, Bryan Olson
<fakeaddress@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Patriot Games, for unfathomable reasons, wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
From: Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@xxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.41.56.46
75.41.56.46 = Pinole, CA, USA.
Patriot Games wrote:
Bryan Olson wrote:
Some Obama-haters had hoped for protests and delays:
http://washingtonindependent.com/24362/gop-senators-letters-give-anti-obama-activists-hope
But the last official act of the presidential election went off smoothly:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iE0qKVXKwxfZn1zG5PG7KNWlOvUgD95J4J8G0
The Supreme Court is also off the hook now...
There is no hook for the Supreme Court to be off.
The 18 or so such anti-Obama lawsuits have amassed an impressive record
in court: they always lose. Every case, every appeal, 100% failure.
Oops! "100% failure?"
LIARS are exposed:
12/27/08: Press Release - Philip J. Berg, Esq.?s case filed with the
U.S. Supreme Court regarding OBAMA?s status as not a ?Natural Born?
Berg... He's one part of the 100% percent
Berg had NOT lost when you LIED and claimed 100%
Wrong. That's a failed appeal of a case Berg had already lost.

Berg had NOT lost when you LIED and claimed 100%.

Berg has STILL NOT lost.

Your LIE was on 1/10/09.

The REPORT is 1/13/09.

Learn to like your lie.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More spankings for P. Games, was: Re: ! Bryan Olson Caught LYING...
    ... Berg had NOT lost when you LIED and claimed 100% ... That's a failed appeal of a case Berg had already lost. ... The FACT is Berg hasn't been tossed at SCOTUS. ... Your LIE was on 1/10/09. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: More spankings for P. Games, was: Re: ! Bryan Olson Caught LYING...
    ... Berg had NOT lost when you LIED and claimed 100% ... I said a petition was a failed appeal of a case Berg already lost, you disagreed and said he had not lost. ... YOUR SQUIRMING is NOT SCOTUS. ... Your LIE was on 1/10/09. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: ! Bryan Olson Caught LYING...
    ... There is no hook for the Supreme Court to be off. ... Berg had NOT lost when you LIED and claimed 100% ... Your LIE was on 1/10/09. ... intended and intend to LIE. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: ! Bryan Olson Caught LYING...
    ... There is no hook for the Supreme Court to be off. ... Every case, every appeal, 100% failure. ... Berg had NOT lost when you LIED and claimed 100% ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: ! Bryan Olson Caught LYING...
    ... There is no hook for the Supreme Court to be off. ... Berg had NOT lost when you LIED and claimed 100% ... Your LIE was on 1/10/09. ...
    (alt.politics)
Loading