Re: Scientific "consensus": Pluto not a planet now
- From: Scotius <wolvzbro@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:08:02 -0700
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:23:12 GMT, "Taylor" <123@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I wonder what the scientific "consensus" will be about global warming in a
decade.
Maybe like the scientific "consensus" that the ozone hole was going to
destroy life on earth:
http://www.sabcnews.com/sci_tech/science/0,2172,133627,00.html
I disagree. As far as I'm concerned, Pluto is still a planet.
If you read up on some things NASA has done (the satellite with dual
core nuclear reactors being flown into the Jupiter atmosphere... etc),
it's clear that there's some weird thinking behind a lot of it. I
would suggest that maybe in their cosmology, they "need" an 8 planet
solar system, rather than 9.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: How did the nation that determined that "following orders" was not an acceptable excuse for nazi war crimes end up allowing this?
- Next by Date: Re: No wonder liberals support Hezbollah
- Previous by thread: Re: Terrorist group funded Democrat congressman's trip to Sri Lanka
- Next by thread: Re: Scientific "consensus": Pluto not a planet now
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
