Re: Bush and the wiretap ruling
- From: "PerfectlyAble" <jrhw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Aug 2006 16:12:17 -0700
Joe S. wrote:
So -- if Bush can ignore the judge's wiretap ruling, then that must mean:
-- divorced parents can ignore child support, alimony, and visitation orders
from courts.
-- losers in suits can ignore court orders to pay.
-- convicted criminals can ignore jail sentences.
After all, the aforementioned are nothing but court orders and if the acting
president can ignore court decisions, why not the rest of us??
The MSM says that Bush is defending America by not taking out
court orders retroactively. But we all know that connecting the dots
has always been a problem for the Bush administration and the MSM,
whether it means accessing correctly the effectivelness of a decade of
disarmment, sanctions, bombing programs on Saddam WMD, his links
to terrorist (that hate his guts), or to the fact that Iraq was the
most secular
stable nation in the region before Bush rushed in.
But the rule is, as I understand it, that unless you have the MSM
onside, say you are one of the Mogals or their puppy in the Whitehouse.
then you're pretty much not excused from the law. Otherwise you
just have to prey that people don't just stop sourcing their news
from the MSM and go free internet for News and commentary.
.
- References:
- Bush and the wiretap ruling
- From: Joe S.
- Bush and the wiretap ruling
- Prev by Date: North Korea to test nuke.
- Next by Date: Re: Iran is complicit. We should bust their ass
- Previous by thread: Bush and the wiretap ruling
- Next by thread: North Korea to test nuke.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
