Re: Are nationalists racists?

On 29 Mar 2006 15:40:47 -0800, "infoterror" <infoterror@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Through all that happens in life's sometimes more challenging passages,
I have seen a light that has shone constant and been guiding and that
light is Nationalism, the sun that can shine through any clouds.

I am a White Nationalist
by Francis Playfair


"White nationalism" is just another excuse for naziism in most
cases. I'm not saying that this particular guy may not be genuinely
not against other races, but most of the neo nazis ("White
nationalists") are all about being against everyone else, and wouldn't
know the first thing to do about being positive on behalf of their own
country, which in case they didn't know it IS multicultural, or at
least multiracial. Further, I consider nationalism to be not at all
necessarily a racial thing, but say for instance, political. The US
has the right to set it's own course, even if it's wrong, which is not
what the people at the UN think at all. My response to that would be
"too f**king bad", even thought I think George Bush is an incompetent
and immoral dolt of a man. THAT is nationalism. Nationalism is not
racism, and the neo nazi lie that they are "White nationalists" is a
convenient attempt to co-opt the groups of people they want to attract
into their own movement, just as Hitler's "national socialism" was.

I'm not here because I hate another race, I'm here because I want to
protect the culture, heritage and history of my people, I'm here
because I want to secure a white future for my children, I want to
secure them the best future I possibly can


Most people read me wrong, which doesn't frustrate me as much as it
amuses me. They seem convinced I fit some sort of stereotype, that I'm
some sort of knuckle dragging ape, isolated and ignorant from other
races, socially inept, poor, bitter, angry, filled with hate, who was
either brainwashed in to his views or formed them because of some
unfortunate, unrepresentative incident in my past, someone who is
lacking in self pride or self worth who needs to attack others to
promote myself. They are wrong.

Obviously I'm not an ape, nor do my knuckles drag on the floor. I'm not
going to sit here and over inflate myself, I am not the most
intelligent person on the planet and it would be wrong of me to pretend
I was, but I'm above average in intelligence, my IQ says this as does
my qualifications and my lifetime achievements. Superman I'm not, but
neither am I ignorant.

So, unable to place my views at the altar of ignorance, can I claim my
perspective has been shaped by isolation?

It's a common enough charge that people bring against nationalists, but
I would argue my life has been far from isolated. I was born in
England, but I've lived for large chunks of my life in Wales, Canada,
USA, and other areas of Europe; on top of that I've visited four
continents. I've been a White face in a majority Black world, I've been
a White face in a majority White world, I've been to poor countries,
I've been to rich countries, I've been to right wing places, I've been
to left wing places -- so left wing they've been Communist.

I've been to pro-West places and anti-West places, I've been to
Protestant places, Catholic places, Muslim places, Orthodox places,
Atheist places and places where they have their own forms of religion,
completely alien to the West. I hardly feel that those credentials mark
me out as someone who has lived an isolated life and is ignorant of
other people, other cultures and other races. In fact I find it to be
quite the opposite, I've noticed times when people of other races have
been talking about their race and I've ended up being more racially
aware of it than they are, because they have lived an isolated life.

So is it that old chestnut that I'm socially inept?

I read this one a lot in the media, they often say that White
nationalists have difficulty mixing in society so they have to join
some ultra far right cult to feel at home. Well again this doesn't feel
like it applies to me. I didn't become a nationalist because I can't
make friends offline, in fact I didn't become a nationalist to make
friends at all, although having said that I have met many good people,
in the Cause, that I do class as friends now.

I have always seemed to do quite well offline, I've traveled the world
and met many people, of many nationalities, and had no problems making
friends or interacting.

I read a study, a few years back, into how many "friends" we should
have and of what type, I found myself to be in the sociable category of
the results of that survey, not a party animal, but scoring slightly
above average, which suggests to me there is no social ineptitude.

So is it to do with wealth or poverty?

Again this is a frequent argument used to beat White nationalists over
the head with, but I've had a life that has allowed me to experience
both wealth and poverty and all stations in-between, so how could it be
about money?

So am I angry, bitter, filled with hate?

I don't think I am, I think I'm a sensitive person, acting and
believing what I do out of love. I'm not here because I hate another
race, I'm here because I want to protect the culture, heritage and
history of my people, I'm here because I want to secure a White future
for my children, I want to secure them the best future I possibly can.
Why would I ever want anything less than that for them?

The next generation is far more important to me than my own life. I've
lived long enough on this planet to know that changes will not be
effected over night, therefore the majority of my life, if not all of
it, will be lived in a world that I feel is harmful to myself and to my
race and so the most important thing for me is not about the here and
now, but about the future, about making sure I provide the best future
that I am capable of securing for the next generation, not just my
children, but all White children.

Another frequently leveled charge is that I've obviously been
brainwashed, but again I find this hard to believe, I find it hard to
believe not just because I am not a low intelligence person, but also
because I find it hard to see who could have brainwashed me.

I obviously wasn't brainwashed by the media, the movies, the
newspapers, the schools, or the majority of books, as they all oppose
me, so it would be easier to brainwash an anti than it would be to
brainwash me using the mainstream media, so how was I brainwashed?

Was I brainwashed by peers?

Well I was never recruited to the 'movement.' I found my own way here,
so there was no charismatic figure that led me through deceit to this
position, nor did I have friends with these views, before I formulated
them myself, so I couldn't have been brainwashed by peers.

Then am I lacking in self worth or self pride?

I'm sure some would laugh at that even being suggested here because I
can be an arrogant ***, full of myself sometimes. I don't think I
can be said to be lacking in self worth at all, and I have a lot of
pride in what I've achieved in my life, so I think we can scratch that
one from the list as well.

What about some incident in my past?

Was there an unrepresentative incident, involving a non-White that
shaped my views?

Again, I have to answer no. There have been incidents in my past, more
than I would have liked to experience, but I've also had bad
experiences with White people as well; I'm not one of these people that
claims all Whites are perfect angels and that life would suddenly be
paradise if we were all segregated -- my intelligence stretches beyond
that sort of reasoning. No, I have had bad experiences, but they didn't
make me what I am today, and some of them I merely view as evidence,
supporting the views that I had already formulated. But in the majority
of cases I have viewed these incidents as being personal, isolated
incidents that are representative of nothing.

If a dog bites me I don't instantly believe that all dogs will bite me;
in the same way if I have a bad experience with a non-White, or a
White, I don't assume that that is typical behavior representative of
all. I tend to base my views on much more substantive evidence than
that.

So am I attacking non-Whites to promote my own stock?

Hardly, because as I already stated I am not seeking to attack anyone,
I'm seeking to defend the White race and I don't believe that we have
to wipe all the other races out to secure our future.

In a recent conversation I was talking with a Native Canadian. He is,
by my definition, non-White. By the end of the discussion we were in
agreement. We shared the view that the best thing for both our races
was for us to live apart, so that our own cultures could prosper and
flourish, we agreed that we were not each other's enemies and that our
common enemy was those who force us to integrate -- they were the ones
who threatened us, our heritage and our culture.

Was I attacking him to promote the White race?

I'm not a nationalist because I hate another race; I'm a nationalist
because I want to protect the culture, heritage and history of my
people; I'm a nationalist because I want to secure a White future for
my children, I want to secure them the best future I possibly can. Why
would I ever want anything less than that for them?

I came to the views that I have through independent means, through
reasoning. I have sorted out all sources of knowledge, representing all
sides of the debate; I have cogitated upon this information and come to
my own conclusions. Everything I am ever told I question; everything I
ever read I question; everything I ever hear I question. I don't follow
anyone or anything like a sheep. I make my own decisions and if I think
something is wrong then I will say so. However I do think that the core
principals of White nationalism are right. This is my view, based on
all the evidence that I have found, or that has been presented to me.

Here's a question for you: Why would I chose this route unless I was
120% sure it was right?

Being a non-nationalist is easy, everyday you say what the system wants
to hear, that's easy; being a White nationalist is hard. Every day of
the year I say things the state hates to hear, I risk losing friends
and jobs because of my views, I risk being sent to jail because of my
views, I risk getting beaten up because of my views, I risk being
murdered because of my views. Do you think I'd choose that path
lightly?

I would love to be wrong. Surprised?

No seriously, I would love to be wrong, because if I was wrong then I
could relax, I could live happily in the world knowing I had to do
nothing but enjoy it to secure the future for the next generation. I
wouldn't have to worry about what a boss might think of my views, I
wouldn't be classed as one of the lowest forms of life on the planet, I
wouldn't risk the same beatings, or the same threats to my life, I
wouldn't have to worry about being sent to jail. That would be bliss. I
would love to be wrong; but I'm right.

It's been over five years since I heard a new argument from an anti --
all the time I hear the same recycled junk.

I've almost begged those opposed to my views to show me why I'm wrong,
to show me their vision of a better world, but 99.9% of them can offer
nothing more than insults.

Now I ask you this, I believe that I am defending my culture, my
people, my race, I want nothing more than to secure the future for the
next generation of White people. And I am committed to that goal. How
committed is a person that they can't even answer a question when
asked?

If a person truly believes he is right then shouldn't he be willing to
go to any lengths to 'convert' the people he meets?

Well, convert me.

http://www.nationalistpartyusa.com/WNPlayfair.htm

.

Quantcast