Re: 2 Simple Images Prove Global Warming Beyond a Doubt
- From: "Osiris88" <zz99z@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Feb 2006 23:49:41 -0800
Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
8ackgr0und N015e wrote:
Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
Captain Compassion wrote:
Science can only predict that scientific experiments and observations
made in the past may be reproducible in the future.
It's only late February, and already you are in the lead
for usenet science crackpot of the year! Keep up the good work!
You guys never heard of Karl Popper?
Nope, sorry, don't know him. Did he publish any peer reviewed scientific papers
lately?
Try this : http://www.av8n.com/physics/scientific-methods.htm
But since the evidence of your usenet posts thus far appears to indicate
that you are an incorrigible shit for brains, I don't think it will help you.
The glaring ignorance of the above statement by Elifritz is a perfect
example of the old net adage: The quickest way to get the right answer
is to post the wrong answer.
Sorry, I don't find the ranting of a dead philosopher useful at all.
I wonder if this applies to Bush's "favorite philosopher" Jesus.
If science is an evolutionary process, then its methods evolve as well.
Thus, dead philosophers are thoroughly obsolete in a technological world.
Now, do you have any links to modern literature, or are you talking out your ass as
well.
http://cosmic.lifeform.org
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cheney's 'Accident'
- Next by Date: Re: A Truly Astounding CNN Interview with Former President Jimmy Carter
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 Simple Images Prove Global Warming Beyond a Doubt
- Next by thread: Stop talking about Cheney
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
