Re: Wow! Greenland to be GREEN again



On 18 Feb 2006 17:43:20 -0800, tomaxo@xxxxxxx wrote:


jimpgh2002 wrote:
On 18 Feb 2006 12:03:36 -0800, tomaxo@xxxxxxx wrote:


jimpgh2002 wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:41:21 GMT, wbyeats@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:14:02 GMT, jimpgh2002
<pmojh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:47:49 GMT, "DKat" <disisdkatspam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Leftists = traitors" <rander3127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140224838.142270.55590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And the EWF (Earth Warming Faggots) seem to think this is a bad thing.


Actually it may be a great thing. Florida will be underwater and the
cheating scum that took the choice of president out of the people's hands
will be without a state.

Florida will be underwater...LOL Did you take any science
courses before you dropped out of school?

Guess you never went to school - or maybe you majored in Intelligent
Design?

If the Greenland ice *** melted completely, it would raise global
sea levels by about 7m.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4720536.stm

7 meters is about 20 ft
WB Yeats

;;;;;;


Horrors, the sky is falling, the sky is falling, squawk,
squawk.
Take to the high ground immediately, if not sooner.

Funny dismissive commentary,. Shall we also assume you are not one who
is concerned about WMDs, or a second 911? That seems to be the "sky is
falling" cry of Republicans every time someone criticises them, no
matter how unrelated the criticism.

......


IOW, we are concerned about reality.

Well it's nice to see you are concerned with it then. Does reality
include the record breaking stretch of hurricain seasons we've been
having as well, or do you have some talking points to offer suggesting
it has nothing to do with the warming of the Gulf Coast waters?

I have no idea. I think the sample size is too small to draw
any definite conclusions.

There actually WAS a
9/11, as well as other terrorist attacks in Spain and London, for
instance.

There actually IS global warming occuring. Only the most deluded
fanatics, in complete flight from reality even try to deny that any
more. The best those in servitude to those who profit from the
polutants that are enhancing it's rate can offer is that it is part of
a historical trend, which it is, only it is progressing at an
exponentially faster rate due to the effects of man made polutants.

If there is global warming...and once again I'd say the sample
size is too small...is that necessarily a bad thing?
Maybe there will be benefits. A longer growing season in the
far north(or far south below the equator). Less severe winters, which
would mean less fuel consumption and less $$$$ spent for heating.
Year round golf for those so inclined!
Furthermore, what can we do about it? The earth has seen
cycles all along...an ice age followed by a warming trend, rinse &
repeat.
.


Loading